Oregon Zero Suicide Implementation Organizational Self-Assessment Report

Background

This 2023 update to the 2018 Zero Suicide implementation assessment tool and the accompanying web survey is a collaboration of Portland State University’s Human Services Implementation Lab (iLab), the Oregon Health Authority, the Zero Suicide Institute and other contributors. The assessment was adapted from the Education Development Center’s Zero Suicide resources available at https://zerosuicide.org.

Content is drawn mainly from:

The General and Inpatient Self-Studies (https://zerosuicide.edc.org/resources/key-resources/organizational-self-study). Questionnaires about the extent to which each component of the Zero Suicide approach is in place at a single organization. Zero Suicide recommends completing this self-study at the start of an organization’s Zero Suicide initiative, then every 12 months after that as a measure of fidelity to the model. The self-study questions serve as the basis for this Oregon Zero Suicide Implementation Assessment and have been reformulated as indicators. The response options (or anchors) for each question are included in the grid to define the level of implementation for each indicator.

The Data Elements Worksheet (https://zerosuicide.edc.org/resources/resource-database/zero-suicide-data-elements-worksheet). A list of primary and supplemental measures recommended for behavioral health care organizations to strive for to maintain fidelity to a comprehensive suicide care model. The supplemental measures are clinically significant but may be much harder to measure than the primary measures. Zero Suicide recommends reviewing these data elements every three months in order to determine areas for improvement. Starting with element #3 (Identify) of this implementation assessment, these data points are requested for each relevant indicator as documentation for the rank awarded. Additional data points for indicators added to version 2 of this adaptation were developed by PSU.

OHA is using this implementation assessment to track change over time related to suicide prevention efforts among organizations participating in Zero Suicide Academies sponsored by OHA and the subsequent Zero Suicide Community of Practice Conference Calls.

For More Information On:

Zero Suicide

Visit https://zerosuicide.org

OHA’s Zero Suicide Initiative

Contact Megan Crane, OHA Zero Suicide Coordinator at meghan.crane@dhsoha.state.or.us

The study being conducted using this instrument

Contact Karen Cellarius, Director, Human Services Implementation Lab (https://hsimplementationlab.org), and Senior Research Associate, Portland State University Regional Research Institute for Human Services, at cellark@pdx.edu

Explanation of Elements

Zero Suicide's questionnaire is grouped under seven key elements: (1) Lead, (2) Train, (3) Identify, (4) Engage, (5) Treat, (6) Transition, and (7) Improve. Each standard has been rated on a scale for 1 to 5, where 1 equals “Organization has not yet demonstrated awareness for the need for this component of Zero Suicide” and 5 equals “Component is sustainably in place, monitoring for continuous quality improvement occurs regularly and includes input from people with lived experience.”

The Seven Elements of Zero Suicide

Seven key elements of Zero Suicide are needed in order to have a sustainable infrastructure. Within those seven elements are standards that need to be attained and maintained in order to achieve full implementation of each one.

First

Element #1: Lead

Create a leadership-driven, safety-oriented culture committed to dramatically reducing suicide among people under care. Include suicide attempt and loss survivors in leadership and planning roles.

Second

Element #2: Train

Develop a competent, confident and caring workforce.

Third

Element #3: Identify

Systematically identify and assess suicide risk among people receiving care.

Fourth

Element #4: Engage

Ensure every person has a suicide care management plan, or pathway to care, that is both timely and adequate to meet individual needs.

Fifth

Element #5: Treat

Use effective, evidence-based treatments that directly target suicidality.

Sixth

Element #6: Transition

Provide continuous contact and support, especially after acute care.

Seventh

Element #7: Improve

Apply a data-driven quality improvement approach to inform system changes leading to better care and improved outcomes for individuals at risk.

Suggested Citation: Cellarius, K., Kuhn, S., Tuttle, A., Crane, M., Murray, G., Taylor Parker, C., Lisborg, K. (2023). Oregon Zero Suicide Implementation Assessment Tool (v.2.1): An adaptation of EDC’s Zero Suicide Organizational Self-Study. Portland, OR: Portland State University.

This tool was developed [in part] under Zero Suicide in Health Systems grant #SM083398 and Garret Lee Smith Youth Suicide Prevention grant #SM061759 from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The views, policies, and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of SAMHSA or HHS. For more information and/or a no-cost electronic copy of the full instrument, visit https://hsimplementationlab.org

Assessment Results

Definition of Implementation Ratings

Score of 1 Score of 2 Score of 3 Score of 4 Score of 5
Organization has not yet demonstrated awareness for the need for this component of Zero Suicide. Organization has demonstrated awareness, but work on this component has not yet begun. Organization is actively working to implement component. Component is in place, but it is not yet sustainable or monitored. Component is sustainably in place, monitoring for continuous quality improvement occurs regularly and includes input from people with lived experience.

Scores By Standard

Element #1: Lead
Standard
Total Element Mean Score
Element #2: Train
Standard
Total Element Mean Score
Element #3: Identify
Standard
Total Element Mean Score
Element #4: Engage
Standard
Total Element Mean Score
Element #5: Treat
Standard
Total Element Mean Score
Element #6: Transition
Standard
Total Element Mean Score
Element #7: Improve
Standard
Total Element Mean Score

Detailed Implementation Scores

Element #1: Lead

Create a leadership-driven, safety-oriented culture committed to dramatically reducing suicide among people under care. Include suicide attempt and loss survivors in leadership and planning roles.

Element #2: Train

Develop a competent, confident and caring workforce.

Element #3: Identify

Systematically identify and assess suicide risk among people receiving care.

Element #4: Engage

Ensure every person has a suicide care management plan, or pathway to care, that is both timely and adequate to meet individual needs.

Element #5: Treat

Use effective, evidence-based treatments that directly target suicidality.

Element #6: Transition

Provide continuous contact and support, especially after acute care.

Element #7: Improve

Apply a data-driven quality improvement approach to inform system changes leading to better care and improved outcomes for individuals at risk.